This is a very surprising move, as Sprint pushed very hard for AT&T to be required to both maintain the CDMA network, as well as the roaming agreement, for three years. And they agreed to. So why is Sprint changing their policies here now, and not in 2013 (three years from transaction close)? Only Sprint really knows, but my guess is that without reciprocal roaming - that is, without Alltel customers roaming on Sprint - the costs skyrocket. Again, I have no idea and that is simply an educated guess.
I consider this a good thing. How is loss of coverage good? Because no coverage is being lost. Sprint customers are going to have a worse roaming experience, but people in this area could never become Sprint customers. Maybe Sprint will decide to build their network out here as a result of this? Who knows. They sure weren't going to under the prior arrangement.


0 comments:
Post a Comment